Skip to main content

Hamilton v. State

Citations

  • 703 So. 2d 1038
  • 1997 WL 655899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial where the improper comment was brief and unanticipated by the State, and where the trial court gave the jury a curative instruction
  • finding no error in trial court’s denial of motion for mistrial where witness testimony indicated that a defendant, charged with first-degree murder, sexual battery, robbery, and kidnapping, was involved in another murder
  • “A mistrial is appropriate only where the error is so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial.”
  • improper comment was unanticipated by the State and was brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.