Skip to main content
· 11/30/2005

Longval v. State

Citations

  • 914 So. 2d 1098
  • 2005 WL 3180036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that witness testimony describing the conversation on a surveillance video in evidence was admissible over hearsay objection because it de scribed and gave significance to the ambiguous conduct on the videotape
  • to discern legislative intent requires consideration of, among other things, “the evil to be corrected”
  • “In determining whether to give a requested instruction, the trial court should consider the evidence presented without weighing it, as the latter is a task for the jury.”
  • “The current wording does not limit the defense to 'this section.’ The language is broad enough to embrace substantive crimes, like theft, that include attempts within their definition.”
  • “Since the legislature has expanded the defense of abandonment to apply to ‘criminal attempts,’ we believe the defense applies where the legislature defines a substantive crime to include an attempt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.