Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 663 S.E.2d 142
  • 284 Ga. 17
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2184
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court had taken sufficient “remedial actions” to address a “single confirmed act of dozing” where the court “ask[ed] the jury to stay awake,” “addressed [the sleeping] juror individually[,] and initiated changes to accommodate the juror’s efforts to stay alert”
  • “There must be some sound basis upon which the trial judge exercises his discretion to remove the juror.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • casual visitor, as opposed to an overnight guest, has no expectation of privacy in motel room rented to another
  • person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room if he is not registered guest, has no key, and has no luggage in the room
  • no abuse of discretion in retaining a juror where there was conflicting evidence concerning whether the juror was sleeping, the alleged dozing was limited, and the court counseled the juror in question
  • no abuse of discretion in retaining a juror where there was conflicting evidence concerning whether the juror was sleeping, the alleged dozing was limited, and the court 12 counseled the juror in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.