Skip to main content

Chandler v. State

Citations

  • 642 S.E.2d 646
  • 281 Ga. 712
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 813
  • 2007 Ga. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 2005 amendments to Evidence Code expanded the State’s ability to impeach testifying defendants
  • holding that because the trial court did not rule as to whether defendant made a prima facie showing of discrimination, hut proceeded to an evaluation of the State’s explanations for its strikes, the issue of a prima facie showing is moot
  • noting that 2005 amendments to Evidence Code expanded the State’s ability to impeach testifying defendants
  • “The prohibition on ex post facto laws applies only to substantive, not procedural, rights.”
  • “The prohibition on ex post facto laws applies only to substantive, not procedural, rights.”
  • where prospective juror’s sister and estranged wife had been shot to death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines, Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.