Klinect v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “That Simpson or his counsel held a hope that testifying at Klinect’s trial would benefit him later does not show an agreement. [Cit.]”
• \Photographs showing the condition and location of the victim's body are admissible where alterations to the body are due to the combined forces of the murderer and the elements.\ (citations omitted)
• “Photographs showing the condition and location of the victim’s body are admissible where alterations to the body are due to the combined forces of the murderer and the elements.” (citations omitted)
• “The defense is entitled to a thorough cross-examination, but the scope of cross-examination is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and under the facts of this case, there was no abuse of discretion.”
• issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).