Halverson v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ properly considered daily activities in conjunction with other inconsistencies in the record in assessing the credibility of the plaintiff’s complaints
• holding that the court will “normally defer to the ALJ’s credibility determination” if the ALJ “explicitly discredits the claimant’s testimony and gives good reasons for doing so”
• finding that the ALJ reasonably discounted allegations of disability based in part on unremarkable examination findings
• finding that the ALJ reasonably discounted allegations of disability based in part on unremarkable examination findings
• providing that it is permissible for an ALJ to discount a treating physician’s opinion that is inconsistent with the medical record as a whole
• finding that the ALJ reasonably discounted allegations of disability based in part on unremarkable examination findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).