Eighth Circuit· 8/31/2010

Jones v. Astrue

Citations

619 F.3d 963
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18143
2010 WL 3396835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the ALJ is required to ask whether there is a conflict between the VE evidence and information provided in the DOT
finding that when the VE specifically limited his opinion, “his testimony was a perfectly acceptable basis for the administrative law judge’s conclusions”
holding RFC should be based on all relevant evidence of record
holding RFC should be based on all relevant evidence of record
noting expert testified that number of occupations would be reduced by ten to fifteen percent because of claimant’s limitation to occasional handling
referring to the claimant’s age, education, and relevant work experience as a vocational factor and not a medical factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Hansen, Webber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.