Eighth Circuit· 8/27/2009

Heino v. Astrue

Citations

578 F.3d 873
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19304
2009 WL 2615293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming the ALJ’s dismissal of plaintiff’s subjective complaints when plaintiff’s claim that she could not carry ten pounds was inconsistent with daily activity of carrying nineteen-pound child
when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal
where the ALJ specifically considered Plaintiff’s obesity and found Plaintiff was not disabled, the Court determined reversal was unwarranted
when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal
when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal
when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Smith, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.