Heino v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the ALJ’s dismissal of plaintiff’s subjective complaints when plaintiff’s claim that she could not carry ten pounds was inconsistent with daily activity of carrying nineteen-pound child
• when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal
• where the ALJ specifically considered Plaintiff’s obesity and found Plaintiff was not disabled, the Court determined reversal was unwarranted
• when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal
• when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal
• when an ALJ references the claimant's obesity during the claim evaluation process, such review may be sufficient to avoid reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).