Larry Krogmeier v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 1 Commissioner of Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding substantial evidence supported RFC determination based on medical records, medical opinions, and some aspects of claimant’s testimony
• affirming the denial of benefits based on contemporaneous treatment notes regarding the efficacy of medication and the claimant’s testimony about his daily activities
• stating as long as there is substantial evidence in the record, the ALJ's decision will be upheld even if substantial evidence exists adverse to the ALJ's findings
• stating as long as there is substantial evidence in the record, the ALJ's decision will be upheld even if substantial evidence exists adverse to the ALJ's findings
• stating as long as there is substantial evidence in the record, the ALJ’s decision will be upheld even if substantial evidence exists adverse to the ALJ’s findings
• finding substantial evidence in the record support the ALJ’s decision not to give controlling weight to the treating physician because the physician’s opinion was inconsistent with the physician’s contemporaneous treatment notes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).