Eighth Circuit· 6/6/2011

Martise v. Astrue

Citations

641 F.3d 909
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11365
2011 WL 2175868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that in formulating a claimant’s RFC, an ALJ is not required to rely entirely on a particular physician’s opinion
holding that the ALJ “properly considered the combined effects of [the claimant's] impairments” after discussing each impairment and providing a synopsis of the medical records
holding that the ALJ is required to order further medical examinations only if the existing medical record does not provide sufficient evidence to determine whether the claimant is disabled
holding that ALJ’s synopsis of Martise’s medical records and discussion of each of her alleged impairments was evidence of the ALJ’s proper consideration of the combined effects of her impairments
finding that where claimant had non-severe impairments, ALJ’s RFC formulation was not error where ALJ properly accounted for the combined effects of claimant’s impairments
holding the ALJ is not required to rely entirely on a particular physician’s opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Loken, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.