Hepp v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claimant's constitutional rights were not violated by the ALJ's admission of a medical expert's telephonic testimony
• holding that moderate, over-the-counter medication for pain does not support allegations of disabling pain
• stating that the Court did not believe that “in a non-adversárial proceeding, an in-person cross-examination would significantly increase the accuracy of determining a witness’s credibility over that of a telephone cross-examination”
• declining to remand for alleged error in opinion when error had no bearing on the outcome
• declining to remand for alleged error in opinion when error had no bearing on the outcome
• declining to remand for alleged error in opinion when error had no bearing on the outcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).