Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 195 S.W.3d 250
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 1381
  • 2006 WL 397860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s representation constituted ineffective assistance based on the totality of the circumstances after a motion for new trial hearing established a record of the reasons for counsel’s acts and omissions, and refusing to address issues that had not been raised at that hearing
  • noting appellant did not establish that interviews with potential witnesses “would have revealed beneficial information”
  • trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to inherently prejudicial evidence that \afforded the jury an evidentiary basis for choosing to believe\ the State's narrative of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sitting: Alma L. Lã“pez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.