James Earl Lemons v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ounsel may have decided not to emphasize the evidence by raising an objection on the theory that once a bell has been rung, it cannot be unrung and that the more a jury hears of a matter, the more importance they may attach to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).