Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Florida· 6/27/2013

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 122 So. 3d 856
  • 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 449
  • 2013 WL 3214599
  • 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating Blakely , 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004)
  • analyzing the relevant test for applying a constitutional rule retroactively and concluding that “the new constitutional rule announced in Blakely does not apply retroactively to sentences or resentences that were final when it issued”
  • analyzing the relevant test for applying a constitutional rule retroactively and concluding that “the new constitutional rule announced in Blakely does not apply retroactively to sentences or resentences that were final when it issued”
  • analyzing the relevant test for applying a constitutional rule retroactively and concluding that “the new constitutional rule announced in Blakely does not apply retroactively to sentences or resentences that were final when it issued”
  • explaining why the purpose of the new rule in Blakely did not support retroactivity, that Florida had significantly relied on the old rule, and why applying Blakely retroactively would have an adverse impact on the administration of justice
  • Johnson’s sentence became final in 2000, when the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.