District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/20/2013

Peters v. State

Citations

128 So. 3d 832
2013 WL 6083405
2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the rule “emanated from cases where a defendant consistently maintained his innocence”
holding that a “statutory anomaly” that-existed between October 1, 1983 and July 1, 1995, arising from the application of the decision in Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010
determining that consideration of remorse is appropriate when the defendant injects the issue of rehabilitation into the case by arguing that after years in prison he has been rehabilitated
determining that consideration of remorse is appropriate when the defendant injects the issue of rehabilitation into the case by arguing that after years in prison he has been rehabilitated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forst, Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

111 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.