Skip to main content
· 2/14/2001

United States v. Samuel O. White, Luis Noel Cruz, AKA Danny Cruz

Citations

  • 240 F.3d 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in federal criminal case, that consecutive \sentences are prohibited only if Congress did not intend separate punishments\
  • remanding for resentencing where it was ambiguous whether the district court understood it had discretion to impose concurrent sentences
  • “[T]he district court did not exceed the maximum for any individual count. It cannot therefore be said that, as to any individual count, the court’s findings resulted in the imposition of a greater punishment than was authorized by the jury’s verdict.”
  • applying harmless error review to Apprendi claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sack, Sotomayor, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.