· 3/31/2006
Ramey v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
Citations
- 468 F. Supp. 2d 51
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18579
- 2006 WL 1102836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “DCHRA and federal discrimination claims are analyzed under the same legal standard”
- dismissing a hostile work environment claim based substantially on “isolated comments”
- “One incident — though reprehensible if true — does not a hostile work environment make.”
- “[T]he union grievance filed by plaintiff is not categorically protected, but may be considered protected activity if it alleges discrimination or another practice made unlawful under Title VII.”
- “[O]ffers of compromise or settlement are not probative of discriminatory or retaliatory intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.