Skip to main content
· 3/31/2006

Ramey v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

Citations

  • 468 F. Supp. 2d 51
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18579
  • 2006 WL 1102836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “DCHRA and federal discrimination claims are analyzed under the same legal standard”
  • dismissing a hostile work environment claim based substantially on “isolated comments”
  • “One incident — though reprehensible if true — does not a hostile work environment make.”
  • “[T]he union grievance filed by plaintiff is not categorically protected, but may be considered protected activity if it alleges discrimination or another practice made unlawful under Title VII.”
  • “[O]ffers of compromise or settlement are not probative of discriminatory or retaliatory intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.