Skip to main content
· 7/28/2003

Li Li Manatt v. Bank of America, Na

Citations

  • 339 F.3d 792
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 8318
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6613
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14920
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 599
  • 2003 WL 21730587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mere ostracism in the workplace 25 is not grounds for a retaliation claim. . . .”
  • nine month gapi between protected activity and adverse employment decision not evidence of causation
  • racially charged but sporadic or isolated behavior such as calling someone a “China man” and pulling eyes back to mock the appearance of Asians as insufficient to create a hostile work environment
  • law prohibiting discrimination is not a “general civility code”
  • “§ 1981 applies only to race-based discrimination[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Wallace, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.