Skip to main content
· 3/28/2016

Vick v. Donahoe

Citations

  • 172 F. Supp. 3d 285
  • 2016 WL 1225857
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here a wrongful termination claim would not be cognizable under the provisions of FEHA, the conduct at issue cannot offend fundamental public policy.”
  • “An employer’s business 17 practices concerning its employee are within the scope of the act, including practices that violate 18 FEHA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chutean

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.