Skip to main content

Guillory v. State

Citations

  • 877 S.W.2d 71
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1029
  • 1994 WL 164571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An appellate court may look ... to events before, during and after the commission of the offense in determining whether an individual is a party.”
  • jury could infer common design for robbery from facts that appellant lived with perpetrator, they were together before and after offense, and were in possession of stolen property when arrested
  • AAn appellate court may look . . . to events before, during and after the commission of the offense in determining whether an individual is a party.@
  • jury could infer common design for robbery from facts that appellant lived with perpetrator, they were together before and after offense, and were in possession of stolen property when arrested
  • jury could infer common design for robbery from facts that appellant lived with perpetrator, they were together before and after offense, and were in possession of stolen property when arrested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver-Parrott, Mirabal, Hutson-Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.