Skip to main content

Morrison v. State

Citations

  • 608 S.W.2d 233
  • 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a]cts committed after the [offense] was completed could not make [Morrison] a party to the offense. The circumstances must prove some culpable act before or during the [offense].”
  • reversing 20 appellant’s conviction for robbery as a party and rendering an acquittal where “[t]he conclusion that appellant committed some culpable act rest[ed] entirely on conjecture”
  • ―Acts done after the [offense] was completed [do] not make [the accused] a party to the offense.‖
  • “[a]cts committed after the [offense] was completed could not make appellant a party to the offense”
  • “One’s acts committed after the offense is completed cannot make him a party to the offense”
  • “Acts committed after the robbery was completed could not make appellant a party to the offense. The circumstances must prove some culpable act before or during the robbery.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Odom and Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.