Skip to main content

Watson v. State

Citations

  • 693 S.W.2d 938
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury was not misled by charge, which authorized them to find defendant guilty if he “acting alone or as a party” committed crime, because State proceeded solely on parties theory
  • jury instructed on two theories of offense; court held that although the evidence did not support one of the theories, error was harmless
  • jury was not misled by charge authorizing it to find defendant guilty if he “acted alone or as a party” because State proceeded solely on party theory
  • “Although the evidence was insufficient to raise the possibility of appellant’s ‘acting alone’, appellant was not harmed by the presence of that language in the charge.”
  • under Almanza, burglary defendant was not harmed by inclusion of phrase “acting alone” as well as acting “as a party, to the offense” in application paragraph; evidence showed defendant’s guilt as a party, and State’s argument focused solely on that theory
  • jury application paragraph that authorized conviction if the jury found that the defendant DO NOT PUBLISH ″acting either alone or as a party to the offense″ committed burglary was harmless under Almanza analysis when there TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Teague, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.