Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 83 S.W.3d 308
  • 2002 WL 1723797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in most cases where a motion 15 was found to be implicitly overruled, the trial judge took some affirmative action that clearly indicated a ruling
  • holding that circumstantial evidence was sufficient to show defendant’s guilt as party
  • finding evidence legally sufficient to establish defendant as party to offense of deadly conduct resulting in complainant’s death where witnesses testified that defendant pursued victim’s car and pulled up along left side of her car “very slowly” before passenger fired fatal shot
  • “The evidence supports a finding that Shane knew how Skyler would react in most circumstances. Shane did nothing to discourage Skyler’s fatal reaction . . . .”
  • circumstantial evidence sufficient to show guilt as party
  • circumstantial evidence sufficient to show guilt as party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidd, Smith, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.