Skip to main content

Edmond v. State

Citations

  • 790 N.E.2d 141
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1055
  • 2003 WL 21397702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a witness’s testimony was not offered for the sole purpose of impeaching the witness with his prior statement in which the witness had identified the defendant as the shooter
  • holding that any possible error in the admission of the evidence would have been harmless because the witness’s testimony, including the identification of the defendant as the shooter, was substantially similar to the testimony of another witness
  • witness was present at the scene of the crime and gave a first-hand account of the event
  • witness was present at the scene of the crime and gave a first-hand account of the event
  • citation and quotation 3 Indiana Evidence Rule 401 states, “Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Baker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.