Skip to main content

Majors v. State

Citations

  • 773 N.E.2d 231
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 650
  • 2002 WL 1889692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, viewing the evidence as a whole, the polygraph evidence likely had little effect on the jury and any error in its admission was harmless
  • concluding that the defendant had waived arguments not supported by cogent argument
  • finding no error based upon lack of evidence that alcohol influenced daily deliberations in case where, on evening after third day of deliberations, one juror ordered and drank two beers, and bailiffs were allegedly “running up and down the hall filling [drink] orders.”
  • “the admission of polygraph evidence is subject to harmless error analysis. The probable impact of the polygraph reference upon the verdict is of prime importance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.