District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/18/1986
Austin v. State
Citations
- 500 So. 2d 262
- 12 Fla. L. Weekly 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that testimony given regarding circumstances immediately prior to arrest was so \inextricably intertwined\ that an intelligent account of the criminal episode could not have been given without it
- holding that collateral crime evidence was so inextricably intertwined with crime charged that an intelligent account of the criminal episode could not have been given without reference to the other crime
- testimony by defendant's companion to circumstances immediately prior to activity which gave rise to charges, was so inextricably intertwined with crimes charged, that intelligent account of criminal episode could not have been given without background shooting
- testimony by defendant’s companion to circumstances immediately pri- or to activity which gave rise to charges, was so inextricably intertwined with crimes charged, that intelligent account of criminal episode could not have been given without background shooting
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-07-07· cited 140×
- Dorsett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 51×
- Erickson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-13· cited 46×
- Irving v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-23· cited 25×
- Vail v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-22· cited 9×
- Sapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-19· cited 8×
- State v. RambaranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-23· cited 7×
- D.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-15· cited 7×
- Platt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-15· cited 3×
- Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-14· cited 2×
- Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-19· cited 1×
- DM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-15
- Oyibo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-05
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-02-02· cited 147×
- United States v. Alberto Montes-Cardenas, A/K/A Tony CamposEleventh Circuit· 1984-11-15· cited 141×
- Heiney v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-10-15· cited 124×
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-26· cited 105×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-11-09· cited 58×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-16· cited 41×
- United States v. Arthur John Kloock, IIIFifth Circuit· 1981-08-04· cited 39×
- Tumulty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-28· cited 29×
- United States v. Belony Saintil and Kersazan Tacius, United States of America v. Kersazan Tacius and Belony SaintilEleventh Circuit· 1985-02-22· cited 23×
- United States v. Al Leichtman, Salvatore Lombardo, United States of America v. Paul Lombardo, United States of America v. Estanley NeilEleventh Circuit· 1984-09-24· cited 17×
- Finklea v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-06· cited 10×
- Lloyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-23· cited 3×
- Utsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.