Skip to main content

Austin v. State

Citations

  • 500 So. 2d 262
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony given regarding circumstances immediately prior to arrest was so \inextricably intertwined\ that an intelligent account of the criminal episode could not have been given without it
  • holding that collateral crime evidence was so inextricably intertwined with crime charged that an intelligent account of the criminal episode could not have been given without reference to the other crime
  • testimony by defendant's companion to circumstances immediately prior to activity which gave rise to charges, was so inextricably intertwined with crimes charged, that intelligent account of criminal episode could not have been given without background shooting
  • testimony by defendant’s companion to circumstances immediately pri- or to activity which gave rise to charges, was so inextricably intertwined with crimes charged, that intelligent account of criminal episode could not have been given without background shooting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.