Skip to main content

Dias v. State

Citations

  • 601 P.2d 706
  • 95 Nev. 710
  • 1979 Nev. LEXIS 644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that hearsay evidence identifying the defendant as the perpetrator was harmless because there was other direct and circumstantial 5 evidence linking the defendant to the crimes in question
  • holding that 'We conclude that a response to the pro se brief is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(0(3). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
  • holding hearsay claim was waived by defense tactics
  • “When a hearsay objection is lodged ... on the grounds that the declarant has not been made available at trial and, as a result, cannot be subjected to cross-examination, the policy of the confrontation clause is invoked equally with that of the hearsay rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.