Gowland v. Aetna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim against a WYO insurer is a claim against the federal government for the purposes of applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel
• holding that a claim against a WYO insurer is a claim against the federal government for the purposes of applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel
• recognizing that payments made by a WYO insurance company pursuant to a Standard Flood Insurance Policy are “a direct charge on the public treasury.”
• holding that notice of loss is \separate and distinct\ from the formal proof of loss required by the policy
• stating that payments made pursuant to a WYO issued policy are \a direct charge on the public treasury\
• holding that substantial compliance with proof of loss requirement is not enough

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).