Dwyer v. Fidelity National Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]erving as a fiscal agent and a participant in a heavily regulated federal program did not transform [the WYO carrier] into a federal agency under the EAJA.”
• reversing an award of attorney’s fees against a WYO carrier because WYO carriers are not federal agencies even though they serve as fiscal agents of the United States
• reversing award of attorney's fees against WYO carrier under EAJA because the EAJA only applies to suits brought against the 13 Adams v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Connecticut, 465 F.3d 156, 162 (5th Cir. 2006) (citations and quotations omitted
• holding appraisal provision courts persuasive.”
• Rule 12(b)(6); Boyd v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 3:08-cv-0426-M, 2009 WL 159243, at (N.D. Tex. Jan 21, 2009) (citing Sosa v. Coleman, 646 F.2d 991, 993 (5th Cir. 1981). 40 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).