C.E.R. 1988, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “remuneration for losses incurred in such suits ... would directly burden the federal Treasury”
• deciding “whether the National Flood Insurance Program . . . is sufficiently comprehensive to preempt a state tort suit arising from conduct related to the Program's administration”
• noting that “state-law claims are 2 preempted by the NFIA” whether contractual in nature or “‘sounding in tort[,]’ but ‘intimately related to the disallowance of [an] insurance claim”
• noting that “state-law claims are 2 preempted by the NFIA” whether contractual in nature or “‘sounding in tort[,]’ but ‘intimately related to the disallowance of [an] insurance claim”
• noting that “state-law claims are 2 preempted by the NFIA” whether contractual in nature or “‘sounding in tort[,]’ but ‘intimately related to the disallowance of [an] insurance claim”
• noting that “state-law claims are 2 preempted by the NFIA” whether contractual in nature or “‘sounding in tort[,]’ but ‘intimately related to the disallowance of [an] insurance claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).