MARSEILLES HOMEOWNERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a FEMA memorandum containing similar terms did not “render permissive the requirement to file a proof of loss prior to filing suit.”
• stating that a motion under Rule 59(e) must clearly set forth a “manifest error of law or fact or must provide newly discovered evidence”
• filing a complete proof of loss is a “condition precedent” to bringing suit for proceeds under a SFIP
• filing a complete POL is a \condition precedent\ to bringing suit for proceeds under a SFIP
• “Under FEMA regulations, strict adherence is required to all terms of the SFIP.”
• “[A]n insured’s failure to provide a complete, sworn proof of loss statement, as required by the flood insurance policy, relieves the federal insurer’s obligation to pay what otherwise might be a valid claim.” (quotations and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).