· 10/30/2000
Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance
Citations
- 122 F. Supp. 2d 523
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18659
- 2000 WL 1785984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This court notes that [the policyholder’s] repeated claims of ignorance regarding the proof of loss statement requirement do not benefit plaintiffs’ position. [SFIP] Art. 10 § (O)(6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simandle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.