Skip to main content
· 10/30/2000

Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 122 F. Supp. 2d 523
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18659
  • 2000 WL 1785984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This court notes that [the policyholder’s] repeated claims of ignorance regarding the proof of loss statement requirement do not benefit plaintiffs’ position. [SFIP] Art. 10 § (O)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simandle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.