Ninth Circuit· 2/2/2000
GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.
Citations
- 202 F.3d 1199
- 2000 WL 126918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that GoTo’s logo is a strong mark despite “the fact that the term ‘Go’ and green ‘Go’ circles are certainly common sights on the Internet”
- concluding that even upon a finding of innocent intent, “it would prove nothing since no such intent is necessary to demonstrate a likelihood of confusion.”
- explaining that section 32 “covers only registered marks,” whereas section 43 “protects against infringement of unregistered marks and trade dress as well as registered marks”
- holding that the district 27 court did not abuse its discretion in authorizing a bond less than that requested by the defendants 28 1 because imposition of such a bond would have precluded the preliminary injunction to take 2 effect
- emphasizing that consistent findings as to all of the eight factors are not necessary “to reach a conclusion as to whether there is a likelihood of confusion”
- stating that this court allows laches to bar trademark infringement cases \only where the trademark holder knowingly allowed the infringing mark to be used without objection for a lengthy period of time\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beezer, Scannlain, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
171 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-02· cited 1,081×
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2001-02-12· cited 489×
- Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCordNinth Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 451×
- Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-03-08· cited 253×
- Entrepreneur Media, Inc., a California Corporation v. Scott Smith, an Individual Dba EntrepreneurprNinth Circuit· 2002-02-11· cited 235×
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-06-04· cited 226×
- Fortune Dynamic, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-19· cited 219×
- JL Beverage Co. v. Jim Beam Brands Co.Ninth Circuit· 2016-07-14· cited 182×
- Pom Wonderful v. Robert Hubbard, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-12-30· cited 159×
- Department of Parks and Re-Creation for the State of California v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc., a California CorporationNinth Circuit· 2006-05-24· cited 131×
- Jeff Boardman v. Pacific Seafood GroupNinth Circuit· 2016-05-03· cited 130×
- Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. Milon-Digiorgio Enterprises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 110×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Enforma Natural Products, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-08· cited 108×
- Lahoti v. VeriCheck, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-16· cited 107×
- Flexible Lifeline Systems., Inc. v. Precision Lift, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-22· cited 104×
- El Pollo Loco, Inc. v. HashimNinth Circuit· 2003-01-17· cited 95×
- La Quinta Worldwide LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. De C.V.Ninth Circuit· 2014-08-06· cited 92×
- Paulsson Geophysical Services, Inc. v. SigmarFifth Circuit· 2008-05-23· cited 82×
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Skechers USA, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-05-10· cited 75×
- Brother Records, Inc. v. JardineNinth Circuit· 2003-01-28· cited 66×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court· 1974-03-04· cited 1,462×
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualNinth Circuit· 1979-06-28· cited 811×
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationNinth Circuit· 1999-04-22· cited 774×
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Ninth Circuit· 1992-02-07· cited 373×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCNinth Circuit· 1999-06-15· cited 291×
- Century 21 Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Billy Sandlin, an Individual, Dba Century Investments & Realty, DefendantNinth Circuit· 1988-05-19· cited 269×
- Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. Skg Studio, Dba Dreamworks SkgNinth Circuit· 1998-04-21· cited 216×
- K-Mart Corporation v. Oriental Plaza, Inc.First Circuit· 1989-05-10· cited 213×
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1963-03-19· cited 205×
- Erik Unt v. The Aerospace Corporation, United States Air Force, Space and Missile Systems Organization, and Air Force Systems CommandNinth Circuit· 1985-07-19· cited 158×
- Kendall-Jackson Winery, Limited v. E. & J. Gallo Winery, a California Corporation, Dba Turning Leaf VineyardsNinth Circuit· 1998-07-08· cited 146×
- Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-12-03· cited 144×
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1963-04-22· cited 120×
- Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1992-04-15· cited 115×
- California Cooler, Inc. v. Loretto Winery, Ltd. And Apam, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1985-10-28· cited 80×
- Ocean Garden, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Marktrade Company, Inc. Alberto J. Soler, Defendants-Counterclaimants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1991-12-31· cited 76×
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Free Sewing MacHine Co. And Apsco Products, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1958-06-23· cited 73×
- Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1986-05-13· cited 72×
- Sardi's Restaurant Corporation, Sardi's Restaurant Services, Inc., and Vincent Sardi v. Lyle Sardie and Western Pubs, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1985-03-12· cited 71×
- Metro Publishing, Ltd., a California Partnership v. San Jose Mercury News, a California CorporationNinth Circuit· 1993-03-08· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.