Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/2/2000

GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.

Citations

  • 202 F.3d 1199
  • 2000 WL 126918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that GoTo’s logo is a strong mark despite “the fact that the term ‘Go’ and green ‘Go’ circles are certainly common sights on the Internet”
  • concluding that even upon a finding of innocent intent, “it would prove nothing since no such intent is necessary to demonstrate a likelihood of confusion.”
  • explaining that section 32 “covers only registered marks,” whereas section 43 “protects against infringement of unregistered marks and trade dress as well as registered marks”
  • holding that the district 27 court did not abuse its discretion in authorizing a bond less than that requested by the defendants 28 1 because imposition of such a bond would have precluded the preliminary injunction to take 2 effect
  • emphasizing that consistent findings as to all of the eight factors are not necessary “to reach a conclusion as to whether there is a likelihood of confusion”
  • stating that this court allows laches to bar trademark infringement cases \only where the trademark holder knowingly allowed the infringing mark to be used without objection for a lengthy period of time\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Scannlain, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

171 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.