Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the fame of a mark does not “cut both ways” in the analysis of the likelihood of confusion
• noting that “the fame of a mark may be measured indirectly ... by the volume of sales and advertising expenditures of the goods traveling under the mark.”
• finding the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board erred by discounting evidence of similarity between marks for children’s modeling clay due to the fame of the opposer’s mark
• \The fifth [ D ] uPont factor ... plays a dominant role in cases featuring a famous or strong mark.\
• “[A] mark with extensive public recognition and renown deserves and receives more legal protection than an obscure or weak mark.”
• “[A] mark with extensive public recognition and renown deserves and receives more legal protection than an obscure or weak mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).