Flexible Lifeline Systems., Inc. v. Precision Lift, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that the standards 8 for injunctions apply equally to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief
• holding 11 that “presuming irreparable harm . . . is inconsistent with, and disapproved by, the Supreme 12 Court’s opinions in eBay and Winter”
• holding that the eBay factors apply to copyright infringement cases
• declining to affirm the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction because the district court presumed irreparable harm without making factual findings that would support a finding of likelihood of irreparable harm
• declining to consider irreparable harm in the first instance because of the “incomplete record” and lack of briefing
• remanding “to allow the district court to make the requisite factual determinations regarding irreparable harm and [to] apply those factual findings to” the test for injunctive relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).