Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that after a finding of unreasonable delay, laches would not apply unless defendant also demonstrated prejudice
• holding that after a finding of unreasonable delay, laches would not apply unless defendant also demonstrated prejudice
• holding that after a finding of unreasonable delay, laches would not apply unless defendant also demonstrated preju- dice
• finding prejudice where had the plaintiff “filed suit sooner, [the infringer] could have invested resources in an alternative identity ... in the minds of the public.”
• indicating courts must be careful not to define laches in such a way as to “render it a spineless defense” (citation omitted)
• deeming prejudice present when the defendant “ha[d] invested enormous resources” to “t[ie] [its product’s] identity to the challenged claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).