Supreme Court· 6/25/1973

Gosa v. Mayden

Citations

413 U.S. 665
93 S. Ct. 2926
37 L. Ed. 2d 873
1973 U.S. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[t]he Court long and consistently had recognized that military status in itself was sufficient for the exercise of court-martial jurisdiction,” a view that was later disavowed by the Court
holding that ”[t]he Court long and consistently had recognized that military status in itself was sufficient for the exercise of court-martial jurisdiction,” a view that was later disavowed by the Court
explaining that “it is well-settled that a party can never waive lack of subject matter jurisdiction”
explaining that “it is well-settled that a party can never waive lack of subject matter jurisdiction”
stating that “a military tribunal is an Article I legislative court with jurisdiction independent of judicial power created and defined by Article III”
refusing to apply retroactively O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S.Ct. 1683, 23 L.Ed.2d 291 (1969), which limited the jurisdiction of courts martial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Court'S, Burger, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Douglas, Stewart, Marshall, Brennan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

167 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gosa v. Mayden

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.