Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/26/1989

Commonwealth v. Strong

Citations

563 A.2d 479
522 Pa. 445
1989 Pa. LEXIS 331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, a defendant’s robbery conviction involved an element of dishonesty tending to discredit him as untruthful and was properly admitted by the trial court for impeachment purposes
“[E]ven if we agreed with appellant’s contention that the admission [of a photograph of the victim] was erroneous, appellant must still demonstrate that the error was prejudicial”
“The record reveals that petitioner’s limited financial resources precluded him from independently securing the services of a private investigator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Papadakos, Hutchinson, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.