Supreme Court· 12/6/1971
Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson
Citations
- 404 U.S. 97
- 92 S. Ct. 349
- 30 L. Ed. 2d 296
- 1971 U.S. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the new rule of law \should not be applied retroactively in the present case\
- holding that courts should look to whether retroap-plieation will further uniformity of the rule and whether any inequity would result when deciding whether to apply a new rule retroactively
- explaining that a rule may be denied retroactive application if its application would work an injustice
- recognizing prospective application of a new rule where, inter alia, inequities might arise from retroactive application
- recognizing justifiable reliance on administrative order as basis for application of doctrine of nonretroactivity
- setting forth the test for retrospective application of new rules of law announced in \judicial decisions\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1,876 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 6,061×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 3,153×
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 1,205×
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 1,200×
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,199×
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannNinth Circuit· 1987-09-21· cited 1,059×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 1,015×
- In re Marriage of LaFleur & PyferSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-01-11· cited 931×
- Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 918×
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 803×
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 786×
- Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 738×
- McKinney v. PateEleventh Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 722×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 1,766×
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 1,608×
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court· 1946-02-25· cited 1,492×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court· 1940-01-02· cited 1,225×
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court· 1964-01-13· cited 1,211×
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 980×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 922×
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 921×
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 887×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 855×
- Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 764×
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 709×
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court· 1947-02-17· cited 644×
- Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 492×
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1964-05-25· cited 363×
Other cases named Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.