Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 8/12/2021

STATE ex rel. MATLOFF v. WALLACE

Citations

2021 OK CR 21
497 P.3d 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that McGirt “shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
“[W]e now hold that McGirt. . . shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
“[W]e now hold that McGirt and our post-McGirt decisions recognizing these reservations shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
“[W]e now hold that McGirt and our post-McGirt decisions recognizing these reservations shall not apply retroactively to void a conviction that was final when McGirt was decided.”
court did not explicitly decide whether it would continue to apply watershed exception but spoke of exception in past tense and predicted that ‘‘such a rule is unlikely ever to be announced’’
link to document # 1050468715

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.