Skip to main content

Carmichael v. State

Citations

  • 505 S.W.3d 95
  • 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 11285
  • 2016 WL 6088976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lack of section 2-a hearing was forfeited by failure to object in the trial court on that basis
  • holding that jury unanimity is required for the findings that a defendant committed two or more acts of sexual abuse over a more than thirty-day period.
  • reasoning that, in the absence of “language expressly requiring a waiver” in the statute, any error in failing to hold an Article 38.37 hearing “is subject to the general requirement of preservation, and is therefore subject to forfeiture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alvarez, Chapa, Pulliam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.