Skip to main content
· 1/19/2005

Mumphrey v. State

Citations

  • 155 S.W.3d 651
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 370
  • 2005 WL 94860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that accused preserved error by establishing general subject matter and indicating on the record that the evidence affected a witness’s bias
  • holding issue was properly preserved where defense counsel stated that the evidence sought was relevant to the witness’s credibility and her tendency to imagine things

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.