Skip to main content
· 7/14/2008

Glover Norvell v. James B. Peake

Citations

  • 22 Vet. App. 194
  • 2008 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 809
  • 2008 WL 2725975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this Court has \repeatedly discouraged parties from raising arguments that were not presented in an initial brief to the Court\
  • instructing that the Court “repeatedly discourage[s] parties from raising arguments that were not presented in an initial brief to the Court”
  • \A party is not allowed to raise at oral argument a new issue for review.\
  • \Improper or late presentation of an issue or argument . . . ordinarily should not be considered.\
  • \Improper or late presentation of an issue or argument . . . ordinarily should not be considered.\
  • the Court has \repeatedly discouraged parties from raising arguments that were not presented in an initial brief to the Court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene, Hagel, Schoelen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.