Veterans Claims· 9/23/1994

Vda de Landicho v. Brown

Citations

7 Vet. App. 42
1994 WL 517533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the filing of a motion for substitution, which was accompanied by the veteran’s death notice, qualified as an informal claim for accrued benefits
holding that RO denial of service connection could not be collaterally attacked because it was subsumed by Board decision on direct appeal
holding that veterans’ claims under chapter 11, “Compensation for Service-Connected Disability or Death,” of title 38, U.S.Code, do not survive their deaths
holding that timely filing of NOA rendered nonfinal the BVA decision that was subject of appeal
holding that informal claim requirements were satisfied by serving documents on the Secretary's litigation representatives
holding that substitution by party claiming accrued benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 5121(a) is not permissible in this Court where appellant-veteran dies while BVA denial is “pending” here on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.