Skip to main content
· 8/26/2004

Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLC

Citations

  • 381 F.3d 1251
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1233
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18161
  • 2004 WL 1902698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that third factor is met where appeal “would serve to avoid a trial or otherwise substantially shorten the litigation”
  • holding, 18 “[t]he term ‘question of law’ does not mean the application of settled law to fact” (internal 19 citation omitted)
  • explaining that an interlocutory appeal “materially advances” the litigation when “resolution of a controlling legal question would serve to avoid a trial or otherwise substantially shorten the litigation.”
  • explaining that resolution of an issue materially advances the ultimate termination of the litigation when it “would serve to avoid a trial or otherwise substantially shorten the litigation.”
  • dis- tinguishing purely legal questions from questions about “the appli- cation of settled law to fact”
  • certification must “serve to avoid a trial or otherwise substantially shorten the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Carnes, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.