Veterans Claims· 3/9/1990
Mokal v. Derwinski
Citations
- 1 Vet. App. 12
- 1990 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 3
- 1990 WL 303128
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, as a matter of policy, \that the Court will adhere to the case or controversy jurisdictional restraints adopted by Article III courts\
- noting that this Court adheres to the case-or- controversy jurisdictional requirements imposed by Article III of the U.S. Constitution
- adopting “as a matter of policy the jurisdictional' restrictions of the Article III case or controversy rubric”
- adopting \as a matter of policy the jurisdictional restrictions of the Article III case or controversy rubric\
- entertaining a petition for writ of mandamus that would compel Regional Office to issue a Statement of the Case so petitioner could appeal to Board of Veterans Appeals
- adopting “the jurisdictional restrictions of the Article III case or controversy rubric,” finding that a petition is moot, and holding that “the Court no longer has jurisdiction and the petition is dismissed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farley, Kramer, Nebeker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
110 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vda de Landicho v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-09-23· cited 272×
- Zevalkink v. BrownFederal Circuit· 1996-12-17· cited 263×
- Best v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 2001-05-15· cited 85×
- In re the Fee Agreement of CoxVeterans Claims· 1997-08-07· cited 73×
- Padgett v. NicholsonFederal Circuit· 2007-01-05· cited 67×
- Larry G. Tyrues v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2009-10-02· cited 64×
- Bond v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1992-04-28· cited 57×
- Aronson v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-11-16· cited 41×
- Waterhouse v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 1992-11-16· cited 37×
- Talbert v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-01-19· cited 37×
- Brady v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1993-02-17· cited 33×
- Horowitz v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1993-06-11· cited 33×
- William R. Young v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2012-05-24· cited 32×
- Cleary v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-10-05· cited 28×
- Glover Norvell v. James B. PeakeVeterans Claims· 2008-07-14· cited 26×
- Archer v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 1992-11-05· cited 24×
- Mintz v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-03-08· cited 24×
- Herlehy v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 2001-06-07· cited 23×
- Losh v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1993-12-20· cited 23×
- Barney O. Padgett v. R. James NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2005-09-07· cited 22×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court· 1971-12-14· cited 1,338×
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 1,222×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 991×
- Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 502×
- United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court· 1920-05-17· cited 269×
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1864-12-15· cited 138×
- Erspamer v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1990-02-23· cited 97×
- United States v. CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-03-06· cited 29×
- In re QuigleyVeterans Claims· 1989-12-19· cited 23×
- Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1978-12-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.