Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 3/28/1991

Wood v. Derwinski

Citations

  • 1 Vet. App. 190
  • 1991 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 163
  • 1991 WL 146405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the duty to assist is not always a one-way street and if a Veteran desires help with his claim he must cooperate with VA's efforts to assist him
  • holding that VA's duty to assist is not a one way street and that if the Veteran wishes help he cannot passively wait for it in circumstances where his own actions are essential in obtaining putative evidence
  • holding that the duty to assist is not a one-way street
  • stating that Board’s assessment of credibility and weight to be given to evidence is finding of fact subject to “clearly erroneous” standard of review
  • noting that VA's duty to assist veterans is not always a \one-way street\
  • noting that “[t]he duty to assist is not always a one-way street”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holdaway, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wood v. Derwinski

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.