The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that written description requires more than a \mere wish or plan for obtaining the claimed chemical invention\
• holding that written description requires more than a “mere wish or plan for obtaining the claimed chemical invention”
• holding that written description requires more than a \mere wish or plan for obtaining the claimed chemical invention\
• holding that written description requires more than a “mere wish or plan for obtaining the claimed chemical invention”
• holding claims to a broad genus of genetic material invalid because the specification disclosed only one particular species
• holding claims to a broad genus of genetic material invalid because the specification disclosed only one particular species

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).