Creekmore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, under Tumulty v. State, Hayes could not have directly appealed his conviction because he pled guilty, and holding the Court of Appeals acted contrary to Tumulty when it reversed Hayes’s conviction sua sponte
• “One consequence of pleading guilty is restriction of the ability to challenge the conviction on direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gilliam v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-24· cited 23×
• Koch v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-08-24· cited 19×
• Allen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-05-01· cited 15×
• Crain v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-31· cited 3×
• Richard Dean Martin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-17
• Larry Shawn Martin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-06-17
• Bryan Scott v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-11-07
• Aaron B. Hoskins v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-03-06
• Matthew Christopher Yost v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-06-05

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Creekmore v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-09-07· cited 46×
• State v. Jones
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-10-13· cited 6×