Richard C. Gross v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea
• holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering consecutive sentences and noting the court’s support for its decision to impose consecutive sentences included that there had been two murder victims
• rejecting challenge to trial court’s denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea when defendant affirmed that he understood his potential sentence but later claimed that he did not fully comprehend his possible sentence
• affirming trial court’s denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea where defendant stated he understood his rights and the terms of plea, was not forced or threatened, and was satisfied with his attorney’s services
• citation Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1706-CR-1245 | November 7, 2017 Page 3 of 5 omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).